SEC's Report On Mark-To-Market Under EESA Says FAS 157 Not A Major Factor In Financial Crisis Or Bank Failures

Section 133 of the EESA required the SEC to study mark-to-market accounting under FAS 157, and, in particular, whether to suspend or eliminate the rule.  The SEC staff issued the mandated  at the end of 2008.  The report clocks in at over 259 pages, and touches on all aspects of FAS 157.  My prior post on the FAS 157 issues is here.

Despite widely held belief that problems applying fair value accounting to illiquid assets was an important factor in spawning the financial crisis that led to the voluminous report, the Staff concluded that mark-to-market accounting did not play a major role in either the bank failures or the crisis at other financial institutions, including specifically Bear Stearns, Lehman and AIG.  The Staff concluded that liquidity pressures brought on by poor risk management and "concerns about asset quality" were the primary drivers of the financial crisis.  It seems to me, however, that these concerns about asset quality may have been concerns by investors as to whether banks and other financial institutions were properly valuing these illiquid mortgage-backed assets on their balance sheet.

The Staff reached itsconclusion that FAS 157 was not a major contributing factor primarily by looking at the recent financial statements of banks that failed and were taken over by the FDIC in 2008.  However, by focusing solely on those banks that were taken over by the FDIC and not considering other banks and financial institutions -- Wachovia and Citigroup come to mind -- that were either acquired before being taken over by the FDIC (Wachovia) or where the government injected sizeable capital to keepthem "healthy" (Citigroup,AIG, and others participating in the Capital Purchase Program), the study seems to have overlooked a large piece of the analysis.  As the report admits, the larger and more complex the financial institution, the more likely fair value accounting would have on the company's reported financial condition.  Therefore, it was these largest and most complex financial institutions that were both most impacted by fair value accounting and whose ailing financial health cascaded through the rest of the financial sector.

The staff also concluded, based "upon Staff observation through its prudential oversight function," that FAS 157 issues were not the "primarydriver" of the crisis; rather the Staff's "observations indicate that the liquidity positions of some financial institutions, concerns about asset quality, lending practices, risk management practice, and a failure of other financial institutions to extend credit appear to be the primary drivers."  The Staff specifically concluded that liquidity and a crisis in confidence in counter-parties, hedge funds, and traders led to the demise of Bear Stearns and Lehman Brothers.  The Staff stated that it believes "liquidity pressures" were the root cause of problems at other financial institutions, investment banks and AIG.

Finding that fair value accounting did not cause much of the problem, the Staff not surprisingly suggested only tweaking the current rules.  It made eight recommendations:

1) FAS No. 157 should be improved and not suspended;

2) Existing fair value and mark-to-market requirements should not be suspended;

3) Additional measures should be taken to improve the application and practice related to existing fair value requirements;

4) The accounting for financial asset impairments should be readdressed;

5) Further guidance is needed to foster the use of sound judgment in this area;

6) Accounting standards should continue to be established to meet the needs of investors;

7) Additional formal measures to address the operation of existing accounting standards in practice should be established; and

8) There is a need to simplify the accounting for investments in financial assets.

Comments

[Jordan 1]

I recently to visit your blog, reading, I very much enjoy, and above the content is great.

[coach outlet]

I agree with your idea.You look like very talented.It is very happy to meet you. Thank you!

[supra shoes]

Thanks a lot for sharing such a interesting article...Iam very much impressed with all ur posts... i wish u to great success for ur project....Awesome job and excellent blog....me expecting more valuable stuffs from u...

[cigarettes]

Very useful information. Your blog is amazing, but I write often. Please post more often!

[air max 90]

Nice blog and the article are simply superb. The article posted was very informative and useful. You people are doing a great job. Keep going.